![]() ![]() any accurate portrayal of the story would have, as these subtleties are present en masse in the book, indeed more so in the book than in the film it could be argued. Firstly, it was said that this version has sexual over/undertones. I seek to defend the story of Peter Pan and in particular this version. Whilst I'm writing here in praise of the film, I feel I must take issue with the comments of Mr John Ulmer who criticised the film for a number of reasons. Indeed it is difficult to see how it could have been better. This is by far the most accurate and striking adaptation of the J.M. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |